 
Visit Our Next
World War News »
"No one would have believed in the last years
of the nineteenth century that this world was being watched keenly and
closely by intelligences greater than man's and yet as mortal as his own;
that as men busied themselves about their various concerns they were
scrutinized and studied, perhaps almost as narrowly as a man with a
microscope might scrutinize the transient creatures that swarm and
multiply in a drop of water." So begins the War Of The Worlds, By
Herbert George Wells, 1898.
Introduction
As strange as it may seem
to most Americans, the 20th Century's quests for world domination are far
from over. Just as Wells described in the beginning of War of the
Worlds, so to0 are we busy with our various selfish concerns, all the while
watched from afar!
Evil is still with us even
today! Repression and conquest
remain alive in our modern world still today. Just as we saw the fall of the old
Soviet, we see the maturing of ever more dangerous foes. Contrary to
what many say on our American "Left", the American Government IS NOT THAT
THREAT! But the threat is out there, and it is very real!
For the United States -
which is the
ONE TRUE stabilizing force in this world - the threats are just as great
now as they were back in 1935, just before the Second World War. And
again, not just on one front, but many.
Strangely, after so much progress and prosperity, most of which was
created by America, our world may be heading back to the
brink of the abyss once again. Just as in the years before W W II, we are faced
with the prospect of WAR; not just a war "over there", nor just isolated
attacks here and there, but TOTAL WAR for the GLOBE.
The failure of governments,
the world over, to care for their populations, has resulted in ideal
opportunities for extremist conversions, just like in Post World War I
Germany, and for extreme military posturing, like in paranoid
Pre-World War II Japan. What goes around comes around again.
The job left half done, later demands it all!
Now the threats come from
two primary vectors: Iran, Syria, and Saudi Arabia (and the rest of
the Arab speaking world) with
the Global War On Terror, but also importantly, and much more subtly: CHINA (and it's satellites:
Nuclear North Korea and Soon To Be Nuclear Iran
- for that is exactly what they are - does anyone really believe China
would suffer a nuclear North Korea, unless it controlled it?).
With our responses in
Afghanistan and Iraq, the most immediate threats from the Arab world have
been neutralized for the moment. That is not to say that new theaters
of war will not be opened. But it does appear that the U.S. has
pushed the reset button on the development of a unified Muslim Super-State,
with Saudi Arabia or Iran as its core. That Super-State, with its likely
extreme fundamentalist government, would have been a major force for evil
in our modern world. Thus by keeping the
independent states of the Muslim Belt separate, the U.S. can keep stable
entities, allowing correct focus on Asia. That is not to say the War
On Terror is over by far; we will likely be living with continued danger
and attacks for many years to come, but at least the state sponsors of
terror are fewer and more manageable.
Afghanistan has brought significant
improvements in our relationships with countries in Southern Asia, and has
given us a base to help maintain stability in the region.
Ironically, the Muslin extremists were a threat to Chine herself, as China
hosts vast Muslin populations, though it always had the means and will to
repress these uprisings. Ironically, our presence may have allowed
for improved relationships between these countries and China, by
stabilizing their governments, they make better business partners, and who
better to partner with than your next door neighbor - China!
The war in Iraq has also
had a benefit in our relationship with China, though in the long run, it may
have been hugely counter-productive. It has allowed China to see our
modern war-fighting capability at work. But perhaps, this new war
with terror will maintain our conventional forces at sufficiently high
levels, to prevent China from seeing us as an easy target, as it did under
the Clinton Presidency. But with every passing year, China grows
stronger, more modern, and more capable. Even now, Europe talks of
lifting weapons sales bans on exports to China!
Additionally, our
government has been trying to stabilize our own backdoor. Mexico,
continues to be a great strategic threat - huge poverty makes that
population prone to manipulation, as has been the case with the drug lords'
very successful operations in Mexico. Make no mistake, if the
democratic government of Mexico falls to an extreme group hostile to the
United States, we will have no choice but to occupy Mexico! China
knows this all to well, and continues to stir the pot south of our border.
We are also striving to stabilize Central America, through the new Central
American Common Market, and U.S Military bases in Panama and Honduras - this should help keep these counties tied to our
prosperity. Unfortunately, two South American countries are not so
stable, and direct US intervention may be required within 5 years - these
being Columbia and Venezuela. Both are being toyed with by the
Chinese, through proxies. These last two are potentially explosive, and could require
a million man force to subdue through open warfare if their governments
fall to narco-guerillas (in the case of Colombia), or continue in the
hands of fascists (in the case of Venezuela). All of which, helps keep us busy,
drains our resources, all the while the Chinese expand and equip.
As we have seen in recent
days, though, the first real conflict is approaching fast, as a result of
Korea, and Taiwan. After fifty years of supporting Taiwan, the test of our
resolve is near at hand. Frankly, if the Chinese decide to take the
small island, there is nothing we can do to save it - yet our position is
confrontational. Is this just drawing a line in the sand, or is
there a deeper strategy here. Clearly, we can not succeed at
appeasement, yet we do not have the force to save Taiwan. This then
raises other questions, when China moves, what can we save? South
Korea? Japan? Southeast Asia? Australia? In
reality, everything depends on Taiwan, for it will be the first battle,
and all that follows will be based upon it's outcome.
Clearly North Korea is the opening dance of
this new conflict. What can we do now that North Korea is nuclear?
Why would China allow this? The answer is simple: distraction.
Just as in World War II, Hitler used Spain and its Civil War as both a
test bed and a distraction - to keep attention off of itself. So
too, is China keeping the focus on North Korea while it prepares.
When the real crisis comes, China will sweep away the North Korean
government and army, and take all of the Korean Peninsula, and in the
process, also Taiwan.
Let us hope that our
leadership continues to be one of strength, for this is what is respected
the world over. Liberal views and approaches have failed. Once
much of China was under our administration, but then as later, instead of
establishing a free and democratic environment for her people, our elite
felt it was too hard and too much effort to finish the job. SO we
left, and allowed our work to have been for nothing. Worse, we paved
the way for later thugs like Mao Se Tung.
What will it be this time? Time and our determination
will tell!
 The Coming Conflict!
It will be the goal of this
website to present the fact and analysis of the coming conflict for your
use.
This is real! This is
serious!
This is the future for our children!
Regardless of how you feel,
you owe it to our country and our children to learn the nature of our
enemies, and the REAL threat we now face! Or it will be our sons AND
daughters dying in American streets holding the line on an advancing
Chinese occupation force in your home town! Think about what that
will do to your property values and your social life!
 The coming conflict is
THE
battle for the world! While Africa is a mess, and the Middle East is
in conflict, the world is now firmly divided between EAST and WEST, NORTH
and SOUTH.
With most of the world in the West, working towards a peaceful future, the
East is in need, and sees the West with avarice. Africa will likely side
with China in the end, and once again, it will be continent against
continent. Once this war is settled, the face of the
geopolitical globe will be set for hundreds of years! Will America
still be a part of it? Or will we be just another Tibet!?
That choice is our own!
The future is our children's!
Do all you can NOW!
I welcome your
comments
China unveils fleet of submarines in bid
to build global trust
- Nuclear craft a cause for concern in
US and Japan
- First public show to mark 60th
anniversary of navy
Tania Branigan in Beijing - The
Guardian, Wednesday 22 April 2009
China will unveil its nuclear submarines
this week at an international fleet review marking the 60th anniversary
of its navy, official media reported yesterday.
The first known public appearance of the craft, off the northern port of
Qingdao, will underscore the growing might of the People's Liberation
Army navy and its attempts to build goodwill by increasing transparency.
China's nuclear submarines have gained prominence lately thanks to
participation in the fleet battling pirates off the coast of Somalia -
the first active mission outside the Pacific - and a confrontation with
the US in the South China Sea last month.
The Chinese navy's commander, Admiral Wu Shengli, said the celebrations,
which would include 21 ships from 14 foreign countries, would show his
country as a force for "peace, harmony and co-operation" at sea, the
Liberation Army Daily reported.
Wu told foreign commanders yesterday that navies needed to work together
to confront transnational security threats such as piracy and terrorism.
"Suspicions about China being a 'threat' to world security are mostly
because of misunderstandings and lack of understandings about China,"
Wu's deputy, Vice-Admiral Ding Yiping, told the state news agency
Xinhua. "The suspicions would disappear if foreign counterparts could
visit the Chinese navy and know about the true situation."
He added: "It is not a secret that China has nuclear submarines, which
are key to safeguarding our country's national security." Chinese media
have speculated that the government will also use the celebrations to
announce more details of its plan to build an aircraft carrier, which is
seen by many as emblematic of its ambitions.
The United States and governments in the region are concerned about
China's growing naval power, sea boundary disputes and rivalry for
resources.
Admiral Gary Roughead, chief of US naval operations and a guest at the
fleet parade, told reporters in Beijing he would use the visit to try to
improve military relations, Reuters said. "We can all look at the types
of ships and the types of airplanes and the numbers of airplanes -
that's interesting and worthy of note," he said. "But it is how
countries elect to use those capabilities, and what the purposes are
that they see, and how they will use them and how they will interact
with other navies. That's important and that's why this dialogue is
under way."
He said Beijing had yet to specify the role an aircraft carrier would
play.
"The fleet review and Somalia are being used by China to try to show
that even as it projects its power it is not a threat to anyone," said
Christian Le Miere, senior analyst for Asia at defence publication
Jane's Country Risk. He said the PLA had sought to portray itself as
transparent and a responsible partner, rebuilding military-to-military
links with the US.
But he added that the US and Japan would be watching warily.
"The incident in the South China Sea was a very clear indication of the
fears of both sides ... China is increasingly concerned by US monitoring
of its activities and the US is increasingly concerned that the Chinese
are developing longer-range blue-water capabilities," he said.
Last month the US accused Chinese boats, including a naval vessel, of
harassing the USNS Impeccable in international waters, while China said
the surveillance ship should not have been operating in its "exclusive
economic zone". The stand-off took place 75 miles south of a major naval
base.
The PLA navy has more than 225,000 personnel and is thought to have as
many as 70 submarines, 10 of them nuclear-powered. It also has about 72
combat ships. But it is continuing to invest heavily in expanding and
upgrading its fleet, with much of the PLA's hefty budget increases in
recent years going to the navy.
Le Miere said China had focused on improving naval capabilities since
the early 1990s as it became more confident about its land borders
because of improved relations with Russia and the US, and land and air
capabilities superior to those of its neighbours.
"We have seen new nuclear submarines, amphibious landing ships, fast
attack craft and major surface weapons, and under the somewhat opaque
'Project 48' we are likely to see an aircraft carrier as well," he
added.
Recent News |
Important Publications |
More Info | Linx
America - Land Of The Free
And The Home Of The Brave! The Shining Light Of Freedom Forever! |
